Overall, this is a very close contest so far, a draw for now I think! With the above in mind, if you have a single device to backup and need a large cloud storage quota then Backblaze might be the best choice between these two, alternatively, SpiderOak is potentially better suited to those who have several devices to keep backed-up given that the cloud storage allocation can be effectively shared amongst them all without a “per device” fee been applied.
#Spideroak pricing full#
NB – Remember, if you want to try any of this functionality out for yourself, both Backblaze and SpiderOak both offer full free trials of their services (this is a 15 day free trial for Backblaze and a 21 day free trial for SpiderOak).
#Spideroak pricing install#
Backblaze offer a straightforward unlimited cloud storage which is charged at $7 per device, whereas SpiderOak offer a fix allocation of cloud storage (starting from $6 for 150GB) which can be shared between unlimited personal devices on the account.īoth services offer very well designed and easy to install and use desktop software, both services are also backed-up with the option to make use of a web-based portal both for managing the respective user accounts as well as for restoring files. In conclusion, when it comes to the key features across both of there products there is clearly one major difference to take note of, this being the amount of storage on offer and the number of devices with which it can be shared.
![spideroak pricing spideroak pricing](https://cdn-resprivacy.pressidium.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/spideroak-prices-.png)
*** SpiderOak One Backup does offer unlimited historic file versions within the storage capacity of the plan being used. More info on Backblaze Versioning can be found at the. ** Any files making use of the extended versioning and over 1 year old will be subject to additional B2 storage fee ($0.005 / GB / Month). * Backblaze comes with 30 days of historic versioning by default, a fee of +$2 / month increases this up to 1 year of historic versioning and +$4 / month affords unlimited versioning**.
![spideroak pricing spideroak pricing](https://dt2sdf0db8zob.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/spideroak-one-cloud-backup-review-1.png)
Key Features of SpiderOak One Backupįinally, whilst SpiderOak One Backup does feature a built-in file synchronisation service for use between multiple devices and Backblaze doesn’t, both services do allow for secure sharing of any backed-up files (with Backblaze providing this functionality via their own B2 cloud storage service). SpiderOak One Backup also provide the option to keep unlimited historic versions of any backed-up files across all devices (within the account storage limit) whereas Backblaze, however, only provide a default 30 days of historic versioning which can be extended up to 1 year for an additional $2 per month fee or unlimited historic versioning for an additional $4 / month fee (plus some nominal storage costs for any versions saved over 1 year, these will be listed in the table below).
![spideroak pricing spideroak pricing](https://www.cloudwards.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/SliderGallery4-600x360.png)
The first major difference to point out here is that Backblaze offers unlimited cloud storage on a per device basis (priced at $7 per month, per device) whereas SpiderOak One Backup, on the other hand, provides set allocations of cloud storage for an entire account (from 150GB at $6 per month upwards) with this allocation been shareable between an unlimited number of personal devices.
#Spideroak pricing plus#
In this section I will be comparing Backblaze with SpiderOak One on some of the core features of each service, this includes the amount of cloud storage on offer, the pricing of the service, the operating systems supported plus several other metrics including historic file versioning and multi-factor authentication support. In this comparison I hope to highlight the differences between them and point out which solution might be better in several different situations, time to go and compare to two!
![spideroak pricing spideroak pricing](https://cloudstoragereviews.co/media/reviews/photos/original/01/ca/58/15_SpiderOakStatus800_1308756531.jpg)
This makes for a comparison between two products which have, by default, strong AES 256-bit data encryption applied to all data at all times, easy to use desktop software, unlimited historic file versioning options and are both available on straightforward monthly plans starting form just $7 and $6 per month respectively.Īt first glance these two backup solutions share a lot of similar features and philosophies when it comes to delivering a secure cloud backup solution. What makes this such a good comparison between Backblaze and SpiderOak One Backup is that both of these services not only have a strong cloud offering at their core, but both also put user privacy and data security at the forefront of their offerings. In this post I will be comparing Backblaze and SpiderOak One Backup, two very strong backup solutions which both feature secure cloud storage, unlimited historic file versioning and always-on data encryption as a key part of their offerings!